Czechia vs Middle Africa: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.0897 kg/ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 0.37 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 5.1 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 22nd and Middle Africa ranks 29th of 185 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4593 kg/ha | 0.0841 kg/ha | 0.3752 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.5174 kg/ha | 0.0969 kg/ha | 0.4205 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5585 kg/ha | 0.0922 kg/ha | 0.4663 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.4867 kg/ha | 0.0893 kg/ha | 0.3973 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Middle Africa?
- Czechia, at 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.0897 kg/ha in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Middle Africa?
- 0.37 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Middle Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Middle Africa rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 22nd and Middle Africa ranks 29th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).