Czechia vs Northern Africa: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Northern Africa
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.109 kg/ha in Northern Africa, a difference of 0.3507 kg/ha.
That makes Czechia's figure about 4.2 times Northern Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 22nd and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 186 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Northern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4593 kg/ha | 0.1428 kg/ha | 0.3164 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.5174 kg/ha | 0.1302 kg/ha | 0.3872 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5585 kg/ha | 0.1267 kg/ha | 0.4318 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.4867 kg/ha | 0.1177 kg/ha | 0.369 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Northern Africa?
- Czechia, at 0.4597 kg/ha against 0.109 kg/ha in Northern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Northern Africa?
- 0.3507 kg/ha, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Northern Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Northern Africa rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 22nd and Northern Africa ranks 26th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).