Czechia vs Russian Federation: Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.4679 kg/ha against 0.4597 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.0082 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Czechia ranks 26th and Russian Federation ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4593 kg/ha | 0.4802 kg/ha | 0.021 kg/ha | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 0.5174 kg/ha | 0.4211 kg/ha | 0.0963 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5585 kg/ha | 0.4857 kg/ha | 0.0728 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.4867 kg/ha | 0.4659 kg/ha | 0.0207 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 0.4679 kg/ha against 0.4597 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Russian Federation?
- 0.0082 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Russian Federation?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Russian Federation rank globally for seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 26th and Russian Federation ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).