Czechia vs Uzbekistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Czechia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 0.4669 kg/ha against 0.4597 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 0.0072 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Czechia ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4593 kg/ha | 0.3852 kg/ha | 0.0741 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.5174 kg/ha | 0.3677 kg/ha | 0.1497 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5585 kg/ha | 0.5931 kg/ha | 0.0346 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 0.4867 kg/ha | 0.482 kg/ha | 0.0046 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Czechia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 0.4669 kg/ha against 0.4597 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Czechia and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0072 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Uzbekistan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Uzbekistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Czechia ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 20th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).