Dominica vs Zambia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Dominica
- Zambia
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 0.125 kg/ha against 0.123 kg/ha in Zambia, a difference of 0.002 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.
Dominica ranks 99th and Zambia ranks 100th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0368 kg/ha | 0.0842 kg/ha | 0.0474 kg/ha | Zambia |
| 1970s | 0.0353 kg/ha | 0.0841 kg/ha | 0.0488 kg/ha | Zambia |
| 1980s | 0.0395 kg/ha | 0.0827 kg/ha | 0.0432 kg/ha | Zambia |
| 1990s | 0.0438 kg/ha | 0.086 kg/ha | 0.0422 kg/ha | Zambia |
| 2000s | 0.0959 kg/ha | 0.0946 kg/ha | 0.0013 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2010s | 0.125 kg/ha | 0.1011 kg/ha | 0.0239 kg/ha | Dominica |
| 2020s | 0.125 kg/ha | 0.1129 kg/ha | 0.0121 kg/ha | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Dominica or Zambia?
- Dominica, at 0.125 kg/ha against 0.123 kg/ha in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Dominica and Zambia?
- 0.002 kg/ha, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Zambia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Dominica ranks 99th and Zambia ranks 100th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).