Ecuador vs Eritrea: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ecuador
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.0432 kg/ha against 0.0411 kg/ha in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0021 kg/ha.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 156th and Eritrea ranks 155th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0975 kg/ha | 0.0646 kg/ha | 0.0329 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0.1007 kg/ha | 0.0407 kg/ha | 0.0601 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.049 kg/ha | 0.0435 kg/ha | 0.0055 kg/ha | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.0402 kg/ha | 0.043 kg/ha | 0.0028 kg/ha | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ecuador or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 0.0432 kg/ha against 0.0411 kg/ha in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 0.0021 kg/ha, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Eritrea rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ecuador ranks 156th and Eritrea ranks 155th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).