Estonia vs Middle Africa: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.4612 kg/ha against 0.0897 kg/ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 0.3715 kg/ha.
That makes Estonia's figure about 5.1 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 21st and Middle Africa ranks 29th of 185 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4056 kg/ha | 0.0828 kg/ha | 0.3228 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.481 kg/ha | 0.0969 kg/ha | 0.384 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.4445 kg/ha | 0.0922 kg/ha | 0.3524 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.4817 kg/ha | 0.0893 kg/ha | 0.3923 kg/ha | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Estonia or Middle Africa?
- Estonia, at 0.4612 kg/ha against 0.0897 kg/ha in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Estonia and Middle Africa?
- 0.3715 kg/ha, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Middle Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Middle Africa rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 21st and Middle Africa ranks 29th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).