Estonia vs Tajikistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Estonia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 0.4757 kg/ha against 0.4612 kg/ha in Estonia, a difference of 0.0145 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 21st and Tajikistan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4056 kg/ha | 0.2788 kg/ha | 0.1268 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.481 kg/ha | 0.3275 kg/ha | 0.1534 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.4445 kg/ha | 0.4027 kg/ha | 0.0418 kg/ha | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.4817 kg/ha | 0.492 kg/ha | 0.0104 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Estonia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 0.4757 kg/ha against 0.4612 kg/ha in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Estonia and Tajikistan?
- 0.0145 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Tajikistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Estonia ranks 21st and Tajikistan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).