Ethiopia PDR vs Lesotho: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0.0885 kg/ha against 0.0865 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.002 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 126th and Lesotho ranks 124th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.102 kg/ha | 0.1407 kg/ha | 0.0386 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 0.0837 kg/ha | 0.1038 kg/ha | 0.0201 kg/ha | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 0.089 kg/ha | 0.0853 kg/ha | 0.0037 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 0.0914 kg/ha | 0.0538 kg/ha | 0.0376 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 0.0885 kg/ha against 0.0865 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Lesotho?
- 0.002 kg/ha, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Lesotho?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Lesotho rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 126th and Lesotho ranks 124th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).