Ethiopia PDR vs Uganda: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Uganda
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 0.0865 kg/ha against 0.0804 kg/ha in Uganda, a difference of 0.0061 kg/ha.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 126th and Uganda ranks 128th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.102 kg/ha | 0.12 kg/ha | 0.018 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1970s | 0.0837 kg/ha | 0.1075 kg/ha | 0.0238 kg/ha | Uganda |
| 1980s | 0.089 kg/ha | 0.0653 kg/ha | 0.0236 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 0.0914 kg/ha | 0.075 kg/ha | 0.0164 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Uganda?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 0.0865 kg/ha against 0.0804 kg/ha in Uganda as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Uganda?
- 0.0061 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Uganda rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 126th and Uganda ranks 128th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).