Georgia vs Paraguay: Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Georgia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.3578 kg/ha against 0.3573 kg/ha in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0005 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Paraguay ahead.
Georgia ranks 37th and Paraguay ranks 38th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2275 kg/ha | 0.1886 kg/ha | 0.039 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.3421 kg/ha | 0.2465 kg/ha | 0.0956 kg/ha | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.303 kg/ha | 0.3511 kg/ha | 0.048 kg/ha | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 0.3389 kg/ha | 0.3427 kg/ha | 0.0038 kg/ha | Paraguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area, Georgia or Paraguay?
- Georgia, at 0.3578 kg/ha against 0.3573 kg/ha in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area between Georgia and Paraguay?
- 0.0005 kg/ha, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Paraguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Paraguay rank globally for seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Georgia ranks 37th and Paraguay ranks 38th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).