Ghana vs Mexico: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ghana
- Mexico
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 0.06 kg/ha against 0.0594 kg/ha in Mexico, a difference of 0.0006 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Ghana ranks 146th and Mexico ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0634 kg/ha | 0.1111 kg/ha | 0.0477 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1970s | 0.0712 kg/ha | 0.1145 kg/ha | 0.0434 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1980s | 0.0665 kg/ha | 0.1254 kg/ha | 0.0588 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1990s | 0.0636 kg/ha | 0.0969 kg/ha | 0.0333 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0.0602 kg/ha | 0.0842 kg/ha | 0.024 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.0533 kg/ha | 0.0715 kg/ha | 0.0182 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.0566 kg/ha | 0.0641 kg/ha | 0.0076 kg/ha | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ghana or Mexico?
- Ghana, at 0.06 kg/ha against 0.0594 kg/ha in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ghana and Mexico?
- 0.0006 kg/ha, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Mexico rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ghana ranks 146th and Mexico ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).