Iceland vs Kiribati: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Iceland
- Kiribati
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 197th and Kiribati ranks 197th of 201 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0052 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.0052 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1970s | 0.0066 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.0066 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1980s | 0.006 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | 0.0059 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 1990s | 0.0066 kg/ha | 0.0001 kg/ha | 0.0065 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.0063 kg/ha | 0.0002 kg/ha | 0.0061 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.0007 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0.0007 kg/ha | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | 0 kg/ha | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Iceland or Kiribati?
- Iceland, at 0 kg/ha against 0 kg/ha in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Iceland and Kiribati?
- 0 kg/ha, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Kiribati rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Iceland ranks 197th and Kiribati ranks 197th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).