Japan vs Mali: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Japan
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0.0924 kg/ha against 0.092 kg/ha in Japan, a difference of 0.0004 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 121st and Mali ranks 119th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.185 kg/ha | 0.1511 kg/ha | 0.0339 kg/ha | Japan |
| 1970s | 0.1236 kg/ha | 0.1575 kg/ha | 0.034 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1980s | 0.1352 kg/ha | 0.1874 kg/ha | 0.0522 kg/ha | Mali |
| 1990s | 0.1068 kg/ha | 0.2093 kg/ha | 0.1025 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2000s | 0.0935 kg/ha | 0.1644 kg/ha | 0.0708 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2010s | 0.0879 kg/ha | 0.1103 kg/ha | 0.0225 kg/ha | Mali |
| 2020s | 0.0912 kg/ha | 0.0933 kg/ha | 0.0021 kg/ha | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Japan or Mali?
- Mali, at 0.0924 kg/ha against 0.092 kg/ha in Japan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Japan and Mali?
- 0.0004 kg/ha, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Mali?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Mali rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Japan ranks 121st and Mali ranks 119th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).