Jordan vs Yemen: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Jordan
- Yemen
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0628 kg/ha against 0.0628 kg/ha in Yemen, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 143rd and Yemen ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4086 kg/ha | 0.1154 kg/ha | 0.2932 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1970s | 0.2828 kg/ha | 0.1026 kg/ha | 0.1801 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1980s | 0.1554 kg/ha | 0.0877 kg/ha | 0.0677 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 1990s | 0.2157 kg/ha | 0.0721 kg/ha | 0.1437 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0.1682 kg/ha | 0.0833 kg/ha | 0.0849 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.1346 kg/ha | 0.0846 kg/ha | 0.05 kg/ha | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.082 kg/ha | 0.0638 kg/ha | 0.0183 kg/ha | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Jordan or Yemen?
- Jordan, at 0.0628 kg/ha against 0.0628 kg/ha in Yemen as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Jordan and Yemen?
- 0 kg/ha, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Yemen?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Yemen rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Jordan ranks 143rd and Yemen ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).