Latvia vs Suriname: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Latvia
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.5695 kg/ha against 0.5322 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 0.0373 kg/ha.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 15th and Suriname ranks 14th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5429 kg/ha | 0.5145 kg/ha | 0.0284 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.5248 kg/ha | 0.5573 kg/ha | 0.0325 kg/ha | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.5688 kg/ha | 0.5202 kg/ha | 0.0486 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.5567 kg/ha | 0.5626 kg/ha | 0.0058 kg/ha | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Latvia or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.5695 kg/ha against 0.5322 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Latvia and Suriname?
- 0.0373 kg/ha, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Suriname?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Suriname rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Latvia ranks 15th and Suriname ranks 14th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).