Lithuania vs Turkmenistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0.6236 kg/ha against 0.5795 kg/ha in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.0441 kg/ha.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Lithuania ranks 5th and Turkmenistan ranks 8th of 186 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5721 kg/ha | 0.5645 kg/ha | 0.0076 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.6769 kg/ha | 0.5362 kg/ha | 0.1407 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.6274 kg/ha | 0.4969 kg/ha | 0.1305 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0.5839 kg/ha | 0.538 kg/ha | 0.046 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Lithuania or Turkmenistan?
- Lithuania, at 0.6236 kg/ha against 0.5795 kg/ha in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Lithuania and Turkmenistan?
- 0.0441 kg/ha, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Turkmenistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 5th and Turkmenistan ranks 8th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).