Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.1669 kg/ha
in 2023
Russian Federation
0.4679 kg/ha
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st
Russian Federation rank
19th

Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Russian Federation
0.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 0.4679 kg/ha against 0.1669 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 0.301 kg/ha.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 2.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 29 groups.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1647 kg/ha 0.483 kg/ha 0.3183 kg/ha Russian Federation
2000s 0.1672 kg/ha 0.4211 kg/ha 0.254 kg/ha Russian Federation
2010s 0.1599 kg/ha 0.4857 kg/ha 0.3258 kg/ha Russian Federation
2020s 0.1644 kg/ha 0.4659 kg/ha 0.3015 kg/ha Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 0.4679 kg/ha against 0.1669 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
0.301 kg/ha, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/seed-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/russian-federation-2/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Russian Federation: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).