Malaysia vs Sudan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Malaysia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0201 kg/ha against 0.0141 kg/ha in Malaysia, a difference of 0.006 kg/ha.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.4 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 171st of 201 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0153 kg/ha | 0.0168 kg/ha | 0.0015 kg/ha | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0143 kg/ha | 0.0215 kg/ha | 0.0072 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Malaysia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0.0201 kg/ha against 0.0141 kg/ha in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Malaysia and Sudan?
- 0.006 kg/ha, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Malaysia ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 171st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).