Mauritius vs Sudan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Mauritius
- Sudan
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.0204 kg/ha against 0.0201 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.0003 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 170th and Sudan ranks 171st of 201 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0216 kg/ha | 0.0168 kg/ha | 0.0048 kg/ha | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.0204 kg/ha | 0.0215 kg/ha | 0.0011 kg/ha | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Mauritius or Sudan?
- Mauritius, at 0.0204 kg/ha against 0.0201 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Mauritius and Sudan?
- 0.0003 kg/ha, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Mauritius and Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Mauritius ranks 170th and Sudan ranks 171st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).