Middle Africa vs Slovakia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Middle Africa
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 0.4308 kg/ha against 0.0897 kg/ha in Middle Africa, a difference of 0.3411 kg/ha.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 4.8 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 13th and Slovakia ranks 26th of 18 regions.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0841 kg/ha | 0.3666 kg/ha | 0.2825 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 0.0969 kg/ha | 0.4735 kg/ha | 0.3766 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 0.0922 kg/ha | 0.4557 kg/ha | 0.3635 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 0.0893 kg/ha | 0.4694 kg/ha | 0.38 kg/ha | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Middle Africa or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 0.4308 kg/ha against 0.0897 kg/ha in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Middle Africa and Slovakia?
- 0.3411 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Slovakia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Middle Africa ranks 13th and Slovakia ranks 26th of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).