Myanmar vs Russian Federation: Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Myanmar
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.5004 kg/ha against 0.4679 kg/ha in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0325 kg/ha.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Myanmar ranks 20th and Russian Federation ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.515 kg/ha | 0.483 kg/ha | 0.032 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 0.5549 kg/ha | 0.4211 kg/ha | 0.1338 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 0.5166 kg/ha | 0.4857 kg/ha | 0.0309 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.5057 kg/ha | 0.4659 kg/ha | 0.0398 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area, Myanmar or Russian Federation?
- Myanmar, at 0.5004 kg/ha against 0.4679 kg/ha in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area between Myanmar and Russian Federation?
- 0.0325 kg/ha, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Russian Federation rank globally for seed β cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Myanmar ranks 20th and Russian Federation ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).