Myanmar vs Tajikistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Myanmar
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.5004 kg/ha against 0.4757 kg/ha in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.0247 kg/ha.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Myanmar ahead.
Myanmar ranks 20th and Tajikistan ranks 22nd of 201 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.515 kg/ha | 0.2788 kg/ha | 0.2362 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 0.5549 kg/ha | 0.3275 kg/ha | 0.2274 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 0.5166 kg/ha | 0.4027 kg/ha | 0.1139 kg/ha | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.5057 kg/ha | 0.492 kg/ha | 0.0137 kg/ha | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Myanmar or Tajikistan?
- Myanmar, at 0.5004 kg/ha against 0.4757 kg/ha in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Myanmar and Tajikistan?
- 0.0247 kg/ha, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Tajikistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Myanmar ranks 20th and Tajikistan ranks 22nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).