North Macedonia vs Sweden: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- North Macedonia
- Sweden
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.3022 kg/ha against 0.295 kg/ha in Sweden, a difference of 0.0072 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 56th and Sweden ranks 59th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3029 kg/ha | 0.3654 kg/ha | 0.0625 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.3638 kg/ha | 0.3422 kg/ha | 0.0216 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0.3266 kg/ha | 0.319 kg/ha | 0.0077 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.3007 kg/ha | 0.2953 kg/ha | 0.0054 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, North Macedonia or Sweden?
- North Macedonia, at 0.3022 kg/ha against 0.295 kg/ha in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between North Macedonia and Sweden?
- 0.0072 kg/ha, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Sweden rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- North Macedonia ranks 56th and Sweden ranks 59th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).