Sao Tome and Principe vs South Sudan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0108 kg/ha against 0.0071 kg/ha in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0037 kg/ha.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.5 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th and South Sudan ranks 164th of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.008 kg/ha | 0.0104 kg/ha | 0.0024 kg/ha | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0072 kg/ha | 0.0115 kg/ha | 0.0043 kg/ha | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Sao Tome and Principe or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0108 kg/ha against 0.0071 kg/ha in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Sao Tome and Principe and South Sudan?
- 0.0037 kg/ha, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and South Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 167th and South Sudan ranks 164th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).