Slovakia vs Southern Africa: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Slovakia
- Southern Africa
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 0.4308 kg/ha against 0.0433 kg/ha in Southern Africa, a difference of 0.3875 kg/ha.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 9.9 times Southern Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
Slovakia ranks 26th and Southern Africa ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovakia | Southern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3666 kg/ha | 0.0493 kg/ha | 0.3174 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2000s | 0.4735 kg/ha | 0.0424 kg/ha | 0.4312 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 0.4557 kg/ha | 0.0373 kg/ha | 0.4184 kg/ha | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 0.4694 kg/ha | 0.0449 kg/ha | 0.4245 kg/ha | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Slovakia or Southern Africa?
- Slovakia, at 0.4308 kg/ha against 0.0433 kg/ha in Southern Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Slovakia and Southern Africa?
- 0.3875 kg/ha, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovakia and Southern Africa?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Slovakia and Southern Africa rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Slovakia ranks 26th and Southern Africa ranks 29th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).