Thailand vs Yugoslav SFR: Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Thailand
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 0.2814 kg/ha against 0.2715 kg/ha in Thailand, a difference of 0.0099 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Thailand ranks 66th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.341 kg/ha | 0.4039 kg/ha | 0.063 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 0.2858 kg/ha | 0.3915 kg/ha | 0.1056 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 0.2486 kg/ha | 0.3588 kg/ha | 0.1102 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 0.2318 kg/ha | 0.3166 kg/ha | 0.0849 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Thailand or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 0.2814 kg/ha against 0.2715 kg/ha in Thailand as of 1991.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Thailand and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.0099 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Thailand and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Thailand ranks 66th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 63rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).