Afghanistan vs Mozambique: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Afghanistan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 1,434 t against 1,350 t in Mozambique, a difference of 84 t.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 49th and Mozambique ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,031 t | 447.06 t | 583.52 t | Afghanistan |
| 1970s | 1,083 t | 443.63 t | 639.34 t | Afghanistan |
| 1980s | 822.14 t | 453.32 t | 368.81 t | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 866.64 t | 484.15 t | 382.48 t | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 1,144 t | 759.5 t | 384.71 t | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 1,568 t | 809.19 t | 759.12 t | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 1,520 t | 1,159 t | 360.79 t | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Afghanistan or Mozambique?
- Afghanistan, at 1,434 t against 1,350 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Afghanistan and Mozambique?
- 84 t, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Afghanistan and Mozambique rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Afghanistan ranks 49th and Mozambique ranks 51st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).