Africa vs Kazakhstan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Africa
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Africa currently reports 57,734 t against 8,973 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 48,761 t.
That makes Africa's figure about 6.4 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Africa has been ahead every year.
Africa ranks 9th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 32 groups.
Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42,980 t | 10,223 t | 32,757 t | Africa |
| 2000s | 45,971 t | 9,112 t | 36,860 t | Africa |
| 2010s | 49,629 t | 9,880 t | 39,749 t | Africa |
| 2020s | 56,516 t | 8,678 t | 47,837 t | Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Africa or Kazakhstan?
- Africa, at 57,734 t against 8,973 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Africa and Kazakhstan?
- 48,761 t, with Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Africa and Kazakhstan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Africa ranks 9th and Kazakhstan ranks 11th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).