Angola vs Burkina Faso: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Angola
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Angola currently reports 730.77 t against 679.88 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 50.89 t.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Angola ranks 66th and Burkina Faso ranks 68th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Burkina Faso in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 161.31 t | 330.85 t | 169.55 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1970s | 180.87 t | 336.68 t | 155.81 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1980s | 150.41 t | 388.97 t | 238.56 t | Burkina Faso |
| 1990s | 161.09 t | 458.66 t | 297.58 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 326.75 t | 612.68 t | 285.92 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 785.69 t | 719.45 t | 66.24 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 741.13 t | 656.93 t | 84.2 t | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Angola or Burkina Faso?
- Angola, at 730.77 t against 679.88 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Angola and Burkina Faso?
- 50.89 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Burkina Faso?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Burkina Faso rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Angola ranks 66th and Burkina Faso ranks 68th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).