Angola vs Latvia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Angola
- Latvia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 730.77 t against 729.05 t in Latvia, a difference of 1.72 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Angola ranks 76th and Latvia ranks 77th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 161.77 t | 686.01 t | 524.24 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 326.75 t | 564.01 t | 237.26 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 785.69 t | 708.33 t | 77.36 t | Angola |
| 2020s | 741.13 t | 758.51 t | 17.37 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Angola or Latvia?
- Angola, at 730.77 t against 729.05 t in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Angola and Latvia?
- 1.72 t, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Latvia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Angola ranks 76th and Latvia ranks 77th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).