Argentina vs Canada: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Argentina
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 9,960 t against 8,546 t in Argentina, a difference of 1,414 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Argentina ranks 12th and Canada ranks 10th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Canada in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,940 t | 6,950 t | 2,009 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 4,932 t | 6,699 t | 1,768 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 5,298 t | 8,134 t | 2,836 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 6,383 t | 8,661 t | 2,278 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 8,984 t | 9,961 t | 977.16 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 12,906 t | 9,679 t | 3,227 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 11,602 t | 10,163 t | 1,439 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Argentina or Canada?
- Canada, at 9,960 t against 8,546 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Argentina and Canada?
- 1,414 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Canada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Canada rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Argentina ranks 12th and Canada ranks 10th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).