Australia vs Central Asia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Australia
- Central Asia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 13,120 t against 4,508 t in Australia, a difference of 8,612 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 2.9 times Australia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 23rd and Central Asia ranks 20th of 201 countries.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Central Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,817 t | 15,511 t | 12,695 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 3,403 t | 17,147 t | 13,744 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 4,856 t | 16,829 t | 11,973 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 3,566 t | 13,972 t | 10,406 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 4,211 t | 12,662 t | 8,451 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 4,119 t | 14,357 t | 10,238 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 4,035 t | 12,897 t | 8,862 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Australia or Central Asia?
- Central Asia, at 13,120 t against 4,508 t in Australia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Australia and Central Asia?
- 8,612 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Central Asia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Central Asia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Australia ranks 23rd and Central Asia ranks 20th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).