Azerbaijan vs Malawi: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Azerbaijan
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 1,074 t against 1,002 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 72 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 47th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 524.19 t | 661.15 t | 136.96 t | Malawi |
| 2000s | 896.49 t | 820.05 t | 76.44 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 996.31 t | 961.34 t | 34.97 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 1,029 t | 1,065 t | 36.38 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Azerbaijan or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 1,074 t against 1,002 t in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Azerbaijan and Malawi?
- 72 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Malawi rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Azerbaijan ranks 50th and Malawi ranks 47th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).