Belgium vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 301.94 t against 299.73 t in Belgium, a difference of 2.21 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Belgium ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 307.76 t | 405.51 t | 97.75 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 315.45 t | 280.91 t | 34.53 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 287.23 t | 312.56 t | 25.33 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 301.94 t against 299.73 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 2.21 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).