Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 105.58 t against 99.11 t in Ecuador, a difference of 6.47 t.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 120th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 168.12 t | 289.79 t | 121.67 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 171.57 t | 259.63 t | 88.05 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 153.16 t | 122.2 t | 30.96 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 128.45 t | 97.15 t | 31.3 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 105.58 t against 99.11 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
- 6.47 t, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 120th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).