Brazil vs Syrian Arab Republic: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Brazil
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 20,024 t against 3,263 t in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 16,761 t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 6.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 7th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 7th of 186 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,980 t | 2,482 t | 2,497 t | Brazil |
| 1970s | 7,882 t | 2,482 t | 5,400 t | Brazil |
| 1980s | 9,008 t | 2,482 t | 6,525 t | Brazil |
| 1990s | 7,697 t | 2,482 t | 5,215 t | Brazil |
| 2000s | 9,748 t | 2,482 t | 7,266 t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 13,582 t | 2,326 t | 11,256 t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 17,996 t | 2,509 t | 15,487 t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Brazil or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Brazil, at 20,024 t against 3,263 t in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Brazil and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 16,761 t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Brazil ranks 7th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 7th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).