Brazil vs Ukraine: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Brazil
- Ukraine
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 20,024 t against 12,508 t in Ukraine, a difference of 7,516 t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.6 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Brazil ranks 7th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,589 t | 14,974 t | 7,385 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 9,748 t | 14,312 t | 4,564 t | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 13,582 t | 15,339 t | 1,757 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 17,996 t | 13,373 t | 4,624 t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Brazil or Ukraine?
- Brazil, at 20,024 t against 12,508 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Brazil and Ukraine?
- 7,516 t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Ukraine rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Brazil ranks 7th and Ukraine ranks 8th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).