Bulgaria vs Czechia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Bulgaria
- Czechia
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 1,262 t against 1,180 t in Czechia, a difference of 82 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 52nd and Czechia ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,248 t | 1,541 t | 293.54 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 1,233 t | 1,462 t | 229.08 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 1,491 t | 1,422 t | 68.15 t | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 1,357 t | 1,235 t | 121.64 t | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Bulgaria or Czechia?
- Bulgaria, at 1,262 t against 1,180 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Bulgaria and Czechia?
- 82 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Czechia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Bulgaria ranks 52nd and Czechia ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).