Cabo Verde vs Philippines: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cabo Verde
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 1,931 t against 8.46 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 1,923 t.
That makes Philippines's figure about 228.3 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 32nd of 29 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.82 t | 1,598 t | 1,595 t | Philippines |
| 1970s | 1.27 t | 1,918 t | 1,917 t | Philippines |
| 1980s | 9.31 t | 1,824 t | 1,815 t | Philippines |
| 1990s | 11.84 t | 1,915 t | 1,903 t | Philippines |
| 2000s | 8.46 t | 1,998 t | 1,990 t | Philippines |
| 2010s | 9.89 t | 1,848 t | 1,838 t | Philippines |
| 2020s | 8.46 t | 1,929 t | 1,921 t | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Cabo Verde or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 1,931 t against 8.46 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Cabo Verde and Philippines?
- 1,923 t, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Philippines?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Philippines rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Philippines ranks 32nd of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).