Canada vs Pakistan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Canada
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 10,209 t against 9,960 t in Canada, a difference of 249 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 10th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,950 t | 4,204 t | 2,746 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 6,699 t | 5,120 t | 1,579 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 8,134 t | 6,540 t | 1,594 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 8,661 t | 7,975 t | 685.91 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 9,961 t | 9,366 t | 595.73 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 9,679 t | 10,253 t | 574.53 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 10,163 t | 9,980 t | 182.7 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Canada or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 10,209 t against 9,960 t in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Canada and Pakistan?
- 249 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Pakistan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Pakistan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Canada ranks 10th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).