Central African Republic vs Cuba: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central African Republic
- Cuba
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 118.02 t against 116.07 t in Cuba, a difference of 1.95 t.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 107th and Cuba ranks 109th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 93.76 t | 106.17 t | 12.41 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 108.78 t | 105.64 t | 3.14 t | Central African Republic |
| 1980s | 84.78 t | 111.67 t | 26.89 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 91.33 t | 129.23 t | 37.9 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 115.5 t | 120.76 t | 5.26 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 118.02 t | 127.26 t | 9.25 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 118.02 t | 116.07 t | 1.95 t | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Central African Republic or Cuba?
- Central African Republic, at 118.02 t against 116.07 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Central African Republic and Cuba?
- 1.95 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Cuba?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Cuba rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Central African Republic ranks 107th and Cuba ranks 109th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).