Central African Republic vs Egypt: Seed β Cropland phosphorus
Seed β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central African Republic
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 2,369 t against 118.02 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 2,251 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 20.1 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Egypt ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 93.76 t | 1,620 t | 1,526 t | Egypt |
| 1970s | 108.78 t | 1,891 t | 1,782 t | Egypt |
| 1980s | 84.78 t | 1,983 t | 1,898 t | Egypt |
| 1990s | 91.33 t | 2,092 t | 2,000 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 115.5 t | 1,968 t | 1,852 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 118.02 t | 2,170 t | 2,052 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 118.02 t | 2,656 t | 2,538 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed β cropland phosphorus, Central African Republic or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 2,369 t against 118.02 t in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed β cropland phosphorus between Central African Republic and Egypt?
- 2,251 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Egypt?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Egypt rank globally for seed β cropland phosphorus?
- Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Egypt ranks 32nd of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).