Central America vs Ethiopia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central America
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 2,392 t against 2,269 t in Central America, a difference of 123 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.1 times Central America's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Central America ahead.
Central America ranks 28th and Ethiopia ranks 31st of 32 groups.
Central America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central America | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,121 t | 1,316 t | 1,806 t | Central America |
| 2000s | 2,929 t | 1,714 t | 1,215 t | Central America |
| 2010s | 2,589 t | 2,031 t | 557.88 t | Central America |
| 2020s | 2,478 t | 2,350 t | 128.44 t | Central America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Central America or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 2,392 t against 2,269 t in Central America as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Central America and Ethiopia?
- 123 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central America and Ethiopia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Central America ranks 28th and Ethiopia ranks 31st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).