Chile vs Georgia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 176.32 t against 154.52 t in Georgia, a difference of 21.8 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 110th and Georgia ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 430.44 t | 245.76 t | 184.67 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 391.51 t | 256.1 t | 135.41 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 289.91 t | 144.08 t | 145.83 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 199.57 t | 148.57 t | 51 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Chile or Georgia?
- Chile, at 176.32 t against 154.52 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Chile and Georgia?
- 21.8 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Chile ranks 110th and Georgia ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).