Chile vs Libya: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Chile
- Libya
How they compare
Chile currently reports 176.32 t against 159.91 t in Libya, a difference of 16.41 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 110th and Libya ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 713.46 t | 226.06 t | 487.4 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 675.86 t | 226.06 t | 449.8 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 567.75 t | 226.06 t | 341.69 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 447.02 t | 226.06 t | 220.95 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 391.51 t | 226.06 t | 165.45 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 289.91 t | 208.78 t | 81.14 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 199.57 t | 165.63 t | 33.94 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Chile or Libya?
- Chile, at 176.32 t against 159.91 t in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Chile and Libya?
- 16.41 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Libya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Libya rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Chile ranks 110th and Libya ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).