China, Hong Kong SAR vs Malta: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Malta
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Malta, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 182nd and Malta ranks 182nd of 185 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0146 t | 2.77 t | 2.75 t | Malta |
| 1970s | 0.0282 t | 2.41 t | 2.38 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 0.028 t | 1.93 t | 1.9 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 0.0194 t | 1.45 t | 1.43 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 0.0169 t | 0.9648 t | 0.9479 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 0.0304 t | 0.7236 t | 0.6932 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, China, Hong Kong SAR or Malta?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 t against 0 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
- 0 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Malta rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 182nd and Malta ranks 182nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).