Congo vs Jordan: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Congo
- Jordan
How they compare
Congo currently reports 26.8 t against 18.04 t in Jordan, a difference of 8.76 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.
Congo ranks 148th and Jordan ranks 151st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.12 t | 123.32 t | 108.19 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 14.45 t | 91.23 t | 76.77 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 14.45 t | 51.77 t | 37.32 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 15.18 t | 59.65 t | 44.47 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 18.71 t | 45.22 t | 26.51 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 25.21 t | 39.41 t | 14.19 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 27.2 t | 23.62 t | 3.59 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Congo or Jordan?
- Congo, at 26.8 t against 18.04 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Congo and Jordan?
- 8.76 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Jordan rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Congo ranks 148th and Jordan ranks 151st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).