Congo vs Luxembourg: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Congo
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Congo currently reports 26.8 t against 16.06 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 10.74 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 137th and Luxembourg ranks 140th of 186 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.71 t | 14.23 t | 4.48 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 25.21 t | 21.32 t | 3.9 t | Congo |
| 2020s | 27.2 t | 16.06 t | 11.15 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Congo or Luxembourg?
- Congo, at 26.8 t against 16.06 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Congo and Luxembourg?
- 10.74 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Congo ranks 137th and Luxembourg ranks 140th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).