Costa Rica vs Slovenia: Seed — Cropland phosphorus
Seed — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Costa Rica
- Slovenia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 57.63 t against 55.21 t in Slovenia, a difference of 2.42 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 125th and Slovenia ranks 126th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62.86 t | 67.69 t | 4.83 t | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 60.3 t | 60.78 t | 0.4854 t | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 52.31 t | 60.27 t | 7.96 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 80.94 t | 54.73 t | 26.21 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland phosphorus, Costa Rica or Slovenia?
- Costa Rica, at 57.63 t against 55.21 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland phosphorus between Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 2.42 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Slovenia rank globally for seed — cropland phosphorus?
- Costa Rica ranks 125th and Slovenia ranks 126th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).